AI in Cancer Diagnosis: Breakthrough for Humanity or Ethical Dilemma?

By. Leqi Shen

Editor: Kevin Xu

Introduction

Artificial intelligence (AI) has already restructured how many people worldwide live their lives. With the advent of machine learning (ML) and deep learning networks in the 2010s, humans can now train generative or pattern-recognition models with datasets tailored to various applications, leading to unprecedented advances in academia, finance, and medicine. Among these, applications in healthcare have existed as early as the 1970s, with Stanford University's MYCIN aimed at diagnosing blood-borne bacterial infections (Davenport & Kalakota, 2019). Now, attention has turned toward AI's potential to assist doctors in detecting complex biological patterns to diagnose cancer. AI's ability to analyze extensive medical literature and associate intricate patterns with signs of cancer has revolutionized diagnostic accuracy, offering new opportunities for personalized early detection and treatment strategies not possible with human oncologists. However, with these advancements come ethical considerations that must be addressed, including issues of accountability, transparency, and trust. While AI and ML models hold the potential to revolutionize cancer diagnosis by enhancing accuracy and efficiency, it is imperative to address the ethical and practical challenges to ensure its responsible and equitable integration into medicine.

Applications for AI in Cancer Diagnosis:

Current Relevant Technologies

Machine learning (ML) is a subset of AI that enables human operators to actively train and teach algorithms using preexisting data to perform tasks autonomously without explicit instruction. Using artificial "neuron" algorithms, certain ML models can mimic human neurobiology and perform at a human level in more complex operations, such as image processing or statistical analysis of biological molecules (LeCun et al., 2015).

Imaging and Screening

Naturally, the aforementioned models have demonstrated exceptional efficacy in medical imaging due to their ability to recognize intricate patterns within images. AI-powered systems can analyze mammograms, computed tomography (CT) scans, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with high accuracy. As such, similar applications can be extended to most solid-tumor malignancies where imaging still remains an option in the disease's progression.

Biomarker and Predictive Analysis

ML's ability to correlate incoming data with its training material could be used to predict cancer using early biological signals and proteins obtained through tissue or blood sampling. The use of an ML model has been documented in the early identification of ovarian cancer, predicting signs of oncogenesis, normal cells turning cancerous, based on protein markers and gene expression profiles (Medina et al., 2024). This approach distinguishes itself from image recognition models as it does not require a suitably sized growth and can thus be used in blood and early-stage cancers. Additionally, studies have used ML to assess the trajectory of pancreatic cancer in patients, using past disease data to model a risk assessment for different progressions through the stages of cancer and allowing for a personalized approach to treatment options (Placido et al., 2023).

Benefits of AI in Cancer Diagnosis:

Diagnostic Accuracy

A primary advantage of AI in cancer diagnosis is its potential to enhance diagnostic accuracy. Current studies have shown that when compared with human experts, ML models have similar accuracy in detecting breast cancer through mammograms (Lång et al., 2023). The robust nature of algorithmic processing allows computer models to highlight deviations from normal data that humans may miss in imaging or biomarker testing. By reducing the likelihood of false negatives, AI can thus allow medical professionals to treat cancers early and improve patients' prognoses. Additionally, due to the frequency of mutations that occur in oncologic genomes, it is becoming increasingly difficult for humans to keep track of the effective and ineffective treatments for each subvariant of cancer as it mutates throughout the disease's trajectory (Davenport & Kalakota, 2019).

Diagnostic Efficiency

When used as a tool to supplement human professionals, AI has the potential to expedite the diagnostic process, allowing for the analysis of large volumes of medical images in a fraction of the time required by human specialists. This efficiency is particularly valuable in settings with limited resources, where AI can help alleviate the diagnostic workload of healthcare professionals and allow doctors to handle unusual cases where extra attention is required. By automating routine tasks and clear positives/negatives, AI allows physicians to allocate more time to patient interactions, treatment planning, and rare disease exceptions, ultimately enhancing the overall quality and availability of care.

Practical and Ethical Considerations:

Potential Implementations for Accessibility and Efficiency

Implementing any new healthcare policy faces difficulties providing widespread benefits across the demographic spectrum. Namely, how can one assure governments, healthcare organizations, and technology developers that they work together to create an equitable distribution of AI resources, especially in under-resourced areas?

Infrastructure and Technological Access

Significant investment in tech infrastructure is required to facilitate the effective deployment of AI in healthcare, which includes ensuring that hospitals and clinics, particularly in low-income and rural regions, have access to reliable internet, computational power, and appropriate medical imaging equipment. Moreover, algorithms can be optimized to run on lower-capacity computers. Partnerships across the public, private, and governmental sectors of healthcare can play a crucial role in bridging the infrastructure gap, especially in countries with public or government-funded healthcare, such as Canada.

Training and Education

Next, healthcare professionals must be adequately trained in the use of these technologies. Medical education programs should incorporate AI literacy, focusing on how to interpret algorithm outputs and their incorporation into clinical practice. During this process, it is of utmost importance that AI should not replace healthcare professionals but rather complement their expertise. Oncologists and radiologists possess a depth of clinical knowledge and experience that AI cannot replicate with current models. By working alongside these systems, healthcare professionals can enhance diagnostic accuracy while ensuring that patient care remains personalized, compassionate, and human. The integration of AI should be viewed as a partnership that leverages the strengths of both technology and human expertise.

Policy and Economic Considerations

Effective implementation also requires thoughtful policies and economic incentives to drive adoption. Governments should consider subsidizing the costs of AI technologies for healthcare providers, especially in economically disadvantaged areas. For private healthcare systems, such as the United States, it is imperative that private-public cooperation is maintained across the industry to provide adequate coverage. Policies that promote data sharing while maintaining patient privacy can also help improve the performance of AI models by making more diverse datasets available for training, ultimately making AI applications more robust and generalizable.

Ethical Challenges:

Responsibility and Liability

The use of AI in cancer diagnosis raises important questions regarding responsibility and liability. In cases where an AI system provides an incorrect diagnosis, it will be impossible to determine who should be held accountable—the AI developers, the healthcare providers, or the institutions that deploy the technology. Establishing clear use guidelines is essential to ensure that all parties involved understand their responsibilities and risks when dealing with AI.

Patient Consent and Transparency

It may be difficult to provide patients with information surrounding new deployments of AI in healthcare. Transparency is critical in fostering trust in AI systems, and patients must be aware of how AI is used in their care. Informed consent should include a comprehensive explanation of the benefits, limitations, and potential risks associated with any AI-influenced diagnosis, especially in life-altering situations.

Trust in AI vs. Human Experts

Patients may have reservations about relying on AI for life-altering decisions, particularly in the context of cancer diagnosis. Bridging the patient trust gap between AI and human experts requires the involvement of healthcare professionals in the diagnostic process, maintaining the human aspect of healthcare, and presenting AI technology as a tool rather than a replacement.

Bias in AI Models

AI models inherently depend on the data they are trained on, and biases within training datasets can result in disparities in diagnostic accuracy among different populations. For example, if an AI system is predominantly trained on data from a specific demographic, it may exhibit reduced accuracy when diagnosing patients from underrepresented groups. To address this issue, AI developers must use diverse and representative datasets, continuously evaluate and update AI models to ensure fairness and equity in healthcare, and adequately train healthcare professionals to balance algorithmic and human judgment.

Our customers love the comfort that comes with six-months free support. Our dedicated support forum makes interacting with us hassle-free and efficient.

Conclusion

AI is transforming cancer diagnosis by enhancing accuracy, efficiency, and personalized care. Its applications in medical imaging, screening, and predictive analysis hold substantial promise for improving patient outcomes. However, integrating AI into healthcare also raises significant ethical and practical challenges. Establishing clear ethical guidelines and legal frameworks is essential to ensure AI is safely and responsibly used. Addressing liability, transparency, and bias issues will be crucial to building trust in AI systems and ensuring equitable benefits for all patients. Ultimately, the future of AI in cancer diagnosis is promising, with continued advancements in computing technology and closer collaboration between developers and healthcare professionals. By harnessing the power of AI while addressing ethical concerns, we can create a healthcare system that is more accurate, efficient, and patient-centered while maintaining traditional expectations of human-human interaction in medicine.

References

Davenport, T., & Kalakota, R. (2019). The potential for artificial intelligence in healthcare. Future Healthcare Journal, 6(2), 94–98. https://doi.org/10.7861/futurehosp.6-2-94

Lång, K., Josefsson, V., Larsson, A., Larsson, S., Högberg, C., Sartor, H., Hofvind, S., Andersson, I., & Rosso, A. (2023). Artificial intelligence-supported screen reading versus standard double reading in the Mammography Screening with Artificial Intelligence trial (MASAI): a clinical safety analysis of a randomised, controlled, non-inferiority, single-blinded, screening accuracy study. The Lancet Oncology, 24(8), 936–944. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(23)00298-x

LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015). Deep learning. Nature, 521(7553), 436–444. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14539

Medina, J. E., Annapragada, A. V., Lof, P., Short, S., Bartolomucci, A. L., Mathios, D., Koul, S., Niknafs, N., Noe, M., Foda, Z. H., Bruhm, D. C., Hruban, C., Vulpescu, N. A., Jung, E., Dua, R., Canzoniero, J. V., Cristiano, S., Adleff, V., Symecko, H., . . . Velculescu, V. E. (2024). Early detection of ovarian cancer using cell-free DNA fragmentomes and protein biomarkers. Cancer Discovery. https://doi.org/10.1158/2159-8290.cd-24-0393

Mostavi, M., Chiu, Y., Huang, Y., & Chen, Y. (2020). Convolutional neural network models for cancer type prediction based on gene expression. BMC Medical Genomics, 13(S5). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12920-020-0677-2

Placido, D., Yuan, B., Hjaltelin, J. X., Zheng, C., Haue, A. D., Chmura, P. J., Yuan, C., Kim, J., Umeton, R., Antell, G., Chowdhury, A., Franz, A., Brais, L., Andrews, E., Marks, D. S., Regev, A., Ayandeh, S., Brophy, M. T., V, N., DO, . . . Sander, C. (2023). A deep learning algorithm to predict risk of pancreatic cancer from disease trajectories. Nature Medicine, 29(5), 1113–1122. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-023-02332-5